
|


PPC's Toolkit
Early childhood education: Research summary
Prekindergarten
Groundbreaking research into young children's development proves
that the benefits of quality prekindergarten are dramatic and lasting.
- Prime time for learning: With attentive care, enrichment,
and exposure to books, young children build the mental scaffolding
that will process thoughts and ideas for years to come.
- Ready for school: Children who enter kindergarten from quality
prekindergarten have better reading, language, and social skills
than those who didn't get prekindergarten.
- Jump start for at-risk kids: Children in a Pittsburgh-area
quality prekindergarten program, designed for kids at the highest
risk of failure, were held back a grade or placed in special
education at rates of only 2 percent and 1 percent, in school
districts averaging retention and special education rates over
20 percent. They also showed better behavioral and social skills
- a key factor in chldren's school success and classroom decorum.
- Solution for school success: Children from quality prekindergarten
get better test scores in later grades and are likelier to graduate
from high school - itself a critical indicator of the adult's
life chances.
- Saving money: Quality prekindergarten saves $2 in reduced
special education, remediation, and welfare costs for every
$1 invested.
- Preventing crime: Young children who received enriching early
childhood education experiences, such as nurse home visitors,
quality child care, and quality prekindergarten, are less likely
to become delinquent as teens. In fact, nine U.S. police chiefs
out of 10 believe that expanded early learning programs can
"greatly reduce youth crime and violence."
- Community prosperity: As much as 40 percent of today's workforce
will retire in the next 20 years, so their successors - today's
young learners - must be equipped with the skills for school
success and, after graduation,
- Better citizens: Children from quality prekindergarten are
likelier to mature into responsible citizens - likelier to be
married, with higher educational attainments and better-paying
jobs.
- Economic development: The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
recently cited early childhood development, including quality
prekindergarten, as a better economic development investment
than more traditional approaches. "The conventional view of
economic development typically includes company headquarters,
office towers, entertainment centers, and professional sports
stadiums and arenas. . . . We have argued that in the future
any proposed economic development list should have early childhood
development at the top. The return on investment from early
childhood development is extraordinary, resulting in better
working public schools, more educated workers and less crime."
Full-day kindergarten
Full-day kindergarten can provide both immediate and lasting benefits:
- Higher test scores: In Ohio, full-day kindergartners scored
higher on first-grade reading readiness tests, on reading tests
in the early elementary grades, and on achievement tests in
third, fifth, and seventh grades.
- School success: Full-day kindergartners receive better report
cards, experience fewer grade retentions, require less remedial
instruction, and receive fewer special education placements
than their peers who attended half-day programs.
- More time: In full-day programs, teachers have more time for
both formal and informal instruction and can give children more
individualized attention and reinforcement for positive behavior.
School officials also have more chances to spot learning and
behavioral problems and address them promptly when kindergartners
attend school all day. Full-day kindergarten also creates fewer
disruptions and transitions in a child's day.
- Better behavior: Full-day kindergartners are more creative
and cooperative, more involved in classroom work with other
children, and learn and think more independently than their
peers in half-day programs.
- Better nutrition: The longer school day provides more opportunities
for nutritious meals and snacks - particularly important for
low-income children.
Small class sizes in the early grades
Small class sizes yield significant and lasting gains, particularly
for children who are low-income and who stay in small classes for
three or four years. They work best with classes of 17 or fewer
students, taught by teachers trained in working with small classes.
- Better test scores: Students in small classes got better achievement
test scores in every grade and every subject.
- Bridging the achievement gap: By lifting scores and test grades
among at-risk students, small classes close the achievement
gap between disadvantaged students and their advantaged peers.
- School success: Children from small classes need fewer special
education referrals or grade retentions, and they have better
high school graduation rates.
- Lasting gains: In an ongoing study of Tennessee students placed
in small classes through third grade, gains have persisted so
far through ninth grade.
- Classroom decorum: Small classes experience fewer discipline
problems.
- Parent satisfaction: Parents indicate greater satisfaction
with their children's school experience when their kids are
in small classes.
1 National Academy of Sciences, Neurons to Neighborhoods, 2000
2 University of North Carolina, Cost, Quality and Outcomes Go to
School, 1999.
3 UCLID Center, Unviersity of Pittsburgh and Children's Hoospital
of Pittsburgh, Evaluation of Allegheny County Early Childhood Initiative,
March 2002.
4 National Academy of Sciences.
5 RAND Corporation
8 Arthur Reynolds, Study of the Chicago Child-Parent Centers, Journal
of the American Medical Association, 2001.
9 George Mason University, 1999.
10 University of North Carolina, Early Learning, Later Success:
The Abecedarian Study, 1999.
11 Federal Reserve Bank of Minnesota, "Early Childhood Development:
Economic Development with a High Public Return," fedgazette, March
2003.
12 Ohio Legislative Office of Education Oversight. An Overview of
Full-Day Kindergarten. 1997.
13 National Association of School Psychologists. Op. cit.
14 National Association of School Psychologists. Full Versus Half-Day
Kindergarten Programs: A Brief History and Synopsis. 1997.
15 Ibid.
16 Housden and Kam. Full-Day Kindergarten: A Summary of the Research.
1992.
17 Cryan, Sheehan, Weichel, and Bandy-Hedden. "Success Outcomes
of Full-Day Kindergarten: More Positive Behavior and Increased Achievement
in the Years After." Early Childhood Research Quarterly 7. 1992.
18 National Association of School Psychologists. Op. cit.
19 Finn, Gerber, Achilles, Boyd-Zaharias. The Enduring Effects of
Small Classes, Teachers College Record, 2001.
20 Ibid.
21 Ibid.
22 Ibid.
23 Nye, Hedges, and Konstantopoulos. The Long-Term Effects of Small
Classes in Early Grades, The Journal of Experimental Education,
2001.
24 Ibid
Back to Toolkit
This Page Last Modified
August 11, 2003
|

Pennsylvania Partnerships for Children
116 Pine Street, Suite 430
Harrisburg, PA 17101
717-236-5680 / 800-257-2030
Fax: 717-236-7745
Contact PPC/Questions
|
|